Comparing AirNote and Berries

Berries alternatives for AI therapy notes

Comparisons

Some AI scribe comparisons are easy because the products are built for very different people.

This one is a little different.

Berries and AirNote are both designed with therapists in mind. Both products focus on reducing note-writing time, helping clinicians stay more present in sessions, and turning therapy conversations into structured clinical documentation. Both are more relevant to therapists than a general meeting recorder or generic dictation app.

So the question is not simply: “Which one can write therapy notes?”

Both can.

The more useful question is: “Which workflow, price, and privacy model fits the way I practise?”

For therapists in private practice, that distinction matters. The right AI scribe should not only produce a decent note. It should fit the rhythm of sessions, the sensitivity of client material, the therapist’s device setup, and the financial reality of solo practice.

Is AirNote or Berries better for therapy documentation?

Berries is a popular AI scribe for mental health professionals. It is designed to help therapists generate structured notes quickly, with support for formats such as SOAP, DAP, BIRP, and progress notes. It also offers features such as treatment plans, pre-session highlights, follow-up emails, and support for both in-person and virtual sessions. Its Pro plan includes unlimited sessions, up to 180 minutes per session, treatment plans, pre-session highlights, follow-up email, and customer support.

That makes Berries a strong product for therapists who want a web-based scribe focused on mental health documentation. It is not a broad meeting tool pretending to understand therapy. It is clearly built for therapists, counsellors, psychologists, and other mental health professionals.

AirNote is also therapy-specific, but its structure is slightly different. AirNote is designed around two kinds of note: a concise Clinical Note for the formal record, and a richer Process Note for therapist-facing reflection, formulation, continuity, and preparation for future sessions.

That difference matters because therapy notes often need to do two jobs at once.

One job is formal: document the session clearly, accurately, and proportionately.

The other is clinical: preserve what the therapist needs to remember about themes, emotional process, interventions, client responses, relational patterns, goals, and what may be useful to return to next session.

Berries focuses on generating structured therapy documentation quickly. AirNote focuses on therapy documentation as part of a longer client record, with a clear separation between the formal Clinical Note and the more reflective Process Note.

For many therapists, both approaches will feel familiar. The difference is less about whether either product “understands therapy” and more about which note philosophy feels closer to your practice.

Is AirNote or Berries better for price-conscious solo therapists?

This is the clearest difference.

Berries offers a free plan, including the first 20 sessions free and then 10 new sessions each month. Its Pro plan is listed at $99/month and includes unlimited sessions, follow-up email, pre-session highlights, treatment plans, up to 180 minutes per session, and customer support. It also offers custom pricing for group practices.

AirNote is priced at $9.99/month after a 7-day free trial. Its plan includes unlimited sessions, notes, documents, Ask AirNote, client linking, upcoming sessions, practice analytics, custom templates, and the Mac desktop app.

That means Berries Pro is roughly ten times the monthly price of AirNote.

For some therapists, $99/month may be perfectly reasonable if the product saves enough documentation time, supports their existing web-based workflow, and includes the specific features they want. Many therapists lose hours every week to notes, and a tool that meaningfully reduces that burden can easily pay for itself.

But for solo private practice, price sensitivity is real.

Therapists often pay personally for supervision, insurance, room rental, directories, CPD, accounting, video platforms, scheduling software, website hosting, and clinical tools. A documentation product may be important, but it still has to fit into the economics of the practice.

AirNote’s lower price comes from a narrower product focus and a different technical approach. It is not trying to be a web platform for every device and every practice type. It is a Mac-native therapy documentation app, with local transcription as a core part of the workflow.

For therapists comparing monthly costs, the distinction is straightforward: Berries Pro is $99/month; AirNote is $9.99/month.

Is AirNote or Berries better for audio privacy?

Privacy is one of the most important questions in therapy AI.

A written note is sensitive. But raw session audio is often even more sensitive. It contains the client’s voice, pauses, emotion, names, stories, and the full texture of the therapeutic encounter.

Berries describes itself as HIPAA-conscious and focused on secure clinical documentation for therapists. Public partner and FAQ materials also describe Berries as transforming session details into structured clinical documentation without recording or storing audio from sessions.

AirNote’s approach is built around local transcription. Session audio is recorded and transcribed on the therapist’s Mac. Audio does not leave the Mac for transcription and is deleted immediately after transcription. Client data is not stored on AirNote’s servers, with data living on the Mac and optional encrypted iCloud backup.

Both privacy models are aiming at the same therapist concern: client material should be handled carefully, minimally, and with professional boundaries.

The difference is the architecture.

Berries is a web app designed for mental health documentation, with privacy controls around session handling. AirNote is a native Mac app designed so the raw audio transcription step happens locally on the therapist’s device.

For therapists who are comfortable working in a secure web app, Berries may feel familiar and convenient. For therapists who want the audio transcription step to happen on-device, AirNote’s local-first approach may feel more aligned with how they think about sensitive therapy material.

Is AirNote or Berries better for platform flexibility?

Berries has the advantage if the therapist wants a web-based workflow.

Because Berries is a web app, it is easier to access from different computers and setups. It is designed to work with both in-person and virtual sessions, and its workflow is built around starting a session, ending it, reviewing the note, and pasting it into an EMR or record system.

AirNote is intentionally Mac-native. It is designed for therapists using Apple Silicon Macs. That means it is not trying to be everywhere. It is trying to feel at home on the Mac: local recording, local transcription, therapist-reviewed notes, client records, documents, search, and practice insights in one focused desktop environment.

That will not suit everyone.

A therapist who moves between devices, works from shared computers, or prefers browser-based tools may naturally prefer a web app. A therapist who already runs their private practice from a Mac may prefer a native app that keeps the core workflow close to the device.

The platform choice is not just technical. It shapes the feel of the work.

A web app can feel flexible and accessible. A native Mac app can feel private, contained, and more like part of the therapist’s own workspace.

Is AirNote or Berries better for follow-up and session continuity?

Berries includes useful features around follow-up emails, pre-session highlights, treatment plans, and structured note generation. Those features are directly relevant to therapists who want the scribe to support the work before and after the session, not just during it.

AirNote is also designed around the wider therapy documentation workflow. It can generate client and professional document drafts, such as GP referrals, client session summaries, client homework, work or school excuse letters, and provider progress letters. It also supports client linking and can use relevant prior process-note context where enabled.

The distinction is again one of emphasis.

Berries is a strong web-based therapy scribe with features around notes, treatment plans, pre-session material, and follow-up. AirNote is built around a therapy record that grows over time: Clinical Notes, Process Notes, documents, Ask AirNote, search, and practice insights.

For therapy, this matters because a session is rarely just a standalone event. A useful documentation system should help the therapist return to the work with context, not just finish the note and move on.

Is AirNote or Berries better for therapists overall?

The honest answer is that the products are more similar than some AI scribe comparisons.

Both are therapy-focused. Both aim to reduce documentation burden. Both support structured notes. Both are designed for mental health professionals rather than general office meetings.

The real differences are practical.

Berries is a web-based AI scribe for mental health professionals, with a free plan, a $99/month Pro plan, unlimited sessions on Pro, treatment plans, pre-session highlights, follow-up email, and group-practice options.

AirNote is a Mac-native therapy documentation app priced at $9.99/month, with unlimited sessions, notes, documents, Ask AirNote, client linking, custom templates, practice analytics, and local transcription on the Mac.

So the better question is not “Which product is better?”

It is:

Do you want a web app or a native Mac app?
Do you prefer browser-based flexibility or local Mac transcription?
Does $99/month fit your practice budget, or does $9.99/month feel more proportionate?
Do you want structured therapy notes, or a clearer split between Clinical Notes and Process Notes?
Do you want your documentation tool to be available across devices, or centred on one private desktop workspace?

For therapists, the right AI scribe should reduce the burden of notes without adding complexity, unease, or unnecessary cost. Both Berries and AirNote are trying to help therapists spend less time documenting and more time doing the work that matters. The choice comes down to workflow, privacy preference, platform, and price.

FAQ

Is Berries designed for therapists?

Yes. Berries is designed for mental health professionals and supports therapy documentation, including structured notes, treatment plans, pre-session highlights, and follow-up emails.

Is AirNote designed for therapists?

Yes. AirNote is designed specifically for therapists in private practice, with a focus on Clinical Notes, Process Notes, client documents, client linking, Ask AirNote, and continuity across sessions.

How much does Berries cost?

Berries has a free plan with the first 20 sessions free and 10 new sessions each month. Its Pro plan is listed at $99/month and includes unlimited sessions and additional features.

How much does AirNote cost?

AirNote is priced at $9.99/month after a 7-day free trial, with unlimited sessions, notes, documents, Ask AirNote, client linking, custom templates, practice analytics, and the Mac desktop app.

Is Berries a web app?

Yes. Berries is a web-based AI scribe workflow for mental health professionals.

Is AirNote a web app?

No. AirNote is a native Mac app designed for Apple Silicon Macs.

Does Berries support unlimited sessions?

Yes. Berries Pro includes unlimited sessions, with sessions up to 180 minutes.

Does AirNote support unlimited sessions?

Yes. AirNote includes unlimited sessions on its $9.99/month plan.

What is the biggest difference between Berries and AirNote?

The biggest differences are price, platform, and audio workflow. Berries is a web-based therapy scribe at $99/month for Pro. AirNote is a native Mac therapy documentation app at $9.99/month, with local transcription on the therapist’s Mac.

Ready to get started

Download AirNote, and try it with your next session — free.

Ready to get started

Download AirNote, and try it with your next session — free.

Sessions

KB

Kevin Bradley

28th April 2026

Maternal rupture, interview anxiety

21st April 2026

Initial session, sibling estrangement

AJ

Alison Johnson

SF

Sarah-May Franklin

AG

Arkit Guptur

BF

Bill Fairweather

Done

Sally Franklin

Maternal rupture, interview anxiety

Transcript

|

Process Note

|

Clinical Note

|

Client Docs

Session Focus / Agenda

Broad check-in after several weeks, with focus on the impact of the mother’s recent visit, self-critical thinking, and associated stress and tiredness.


Presenting System and Client Concerns

Client described feeling scattered, tense and emotionally tired, with work stress and recurrent sensitivity to criticism. Maternal comments were experienced as activating and left her feeling ashamed, angry and “not enough.”


Parts Identified

A self-critical part/inner critic; a younger part that wants maternal approval and feels “human” rather than pathetic; an angry part that is not easily expressed; a polite/compliant part that cleans, overexplains and manages others’ reactions; and a fearful part that freezes when boundaries are needed.


Part Roles, Fears and Protective Intentions

The self-critical part appeared to attack vulnerability and shame her for wanting care. The compliant/manager part seemed aimed at preventing criticism and keeping others comfortable. The angry part held protest at being treated unfairly, while the approval-seeking part longed for warmth and acceptance from her mother. The fearful part appeared concerned that direct boundary-setting would be rude or would upset her mother.